Impact of Refineries and Asphalt Processing on Air Quality in 10 Major Cities Around the World

According to WPB, Air quality concerns linked to petroleum refining and asphalt processing have moved from the margins of industrial debate to the center of public policy discussions across multiple regions, particularly in the Middle East, East Asia, and large metropolitan areas with dense infrastructure development. Over the past year, regulatory scrutiny, environmental monitoring data, and urban health assessments have converged on one overlooked contributor: bitumen production and asphalt-related refining activities. Unlike crude oil fuels that dominate energy narratives, bitumen operates largely in the background of urban growth, yet its environmental footprint is increasingly difficult to ignore. From Gulf refining hubs to Asian megacities and European industrial corridors, evidence now suggests that emissions associated with bitumen processing are exerting measurable pressure on urban air quality indicators.

Bitumen refining and asphalt production differ significantly from conventional fuel refining in both process design and emission profiles. These operations rely heavily on high-temperature treatment, oxidation, blending, and storage of heavy residues. The result is a complex mixture of airborne pollutants, including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In dense urban environments, where refineries or asphalt plants operate near residential zones, transport corridors, or ports, these emissions interact with existing pollution sources, compounding health and environmental risks. Recent monitoring campaigns conducted in several global cities indicate that areas surrounding bitumen processing facilities exhibit persistent deviations from baseline air quality measurements, even when overall fuel consumption remains stable.

In the Middle East, cities such as Tehran, Riyadh, and Basra have experienced growing attention from environmental authorities due to the proximity of refining infrastructure to urban expansion zones. In Tehran, long associated with traffic-related air pollution, new assessments highlight the contribution of downstream refining units dedicated to heavy residues and paving-grade bitumen. Seasonal spikes in sulfur dioxide and fine particulate matter have been correlated with periods of intensified asphalt production, particularly during peak construction cycles. Similar patterns have been observed in Basra, where refinery-adjacent neighborhoods report elevated concentrations of airborne hydrocarbons during night-time processing hours, when atmospheric dispersion is limited.

East Asian cities present a parallel but more complex picture. In Beijing and Tianjin, national air quality programs have traditionally focused on coal combustion and vehicle emissions. However, recent datasets reveal that specialized asphalt processing facilities, many of them upgraded or relocated rather than closed, continue to release measurable quantities of hazardous air pollutants. In Seoul, where urban land constraints push industrial activities closer to residential districts, bitumen storage and blending terminals have become focal points for municipal air inspections. Authorities now acknowledge that even modernized facilities, operating within nominal regulatory thresholds, contribute cumulatively to urban pollution loads.

South and Southeast Asia further illustrate the scale of the issue. In Mumbai and Jakarta, rapid infrastructure expansion has driven sustained demand for paving-grade bitumen. Refining and terminal operations servicing this demand are frequently situated near ports, logistics hubs, and densely populated coastal districts. Continuous air monitoring near these zones has identified recurring elevations in benzene, toluene, and fine particulates during asphalt heating and transfer operations. These findings have prompted renewed debate over zoning regulations and the environmental cost of infrastructure-led growth.

European cities, often perceived as benchmarks for industrial regulation, are not exempt. In Rotterdam, Antwerp, and Marseille, bitumen handling is tightly integrated into port-based refining complexes. While emissions controls are generally robust, episodic releases linked to maintenance, storage tank operations, and marine loading have been documented. Environmental agencies in these cities increasingly differentiate between fuel-related emissions and those associated specifically with bitumen and asphalt processing, recognizing that mitigation strategies for one do not automatically address the other.

North America provides further insight into how legacy infrastructure intersects with modern environmental expectations. In Houston and Los Angeles, asphalt plants and heavy residue processing units coexist with residential neighborhoods shaped by decades of urban sprawl. Community-level air quality studies indicate that short-duration emission events, often linked to bitumen oxidation or tank degassing, can significantly influence localized exposure, even when annual averages appear compliant. These findings challenge regulatory frameworks that prioritize long-term averages over acute exposure risks.

Across these ten cities, a common pattern emerges: bitumen-related operations tend to fall into regulatory blind spots. They are neither treated with the urgency of fuel combustion nor fully addressed within industrial air toxics programs. This gap is partly historical. Bitumen has long been categorized as a low-volatility, low-risk material, leading to assumptions that its environmental impact is limited. Contemporary data contradicts this view, showing that processing conditions, not just material properties, determine emission intensity.

Public health implications are increasingly central to this reassessment. Epidemiological studies conducted near asphalt processing zones report higher incidences of respiratory irritation, chronic cough, and eye discomfort among exposed populations. While causality is complex and multifactorial, correlations between emission peaks and reported symptoms have strengthened calls for tighter oversight. Urban planners and environmental ministries now face the challenge of reconciling infrastructure needs with health protection, particularly as cities continue to expand outward toward industrial perimeters.

Technological responses are evolving, but unevenly. Some refineries have adopted enclosed processing systems, vapor recovery units, and low-sulfur feedstocks to reduce emissions from bitumen units. Others rely on incremental upgrades that yield limited gains. The disparity is evident when comparing emission intensity across cities with similar production volumes but differing regulatory enforcement. Where continuous monitoring and transparent reporting are mandated, measurable improvements have followed. Where oversight remains fragmented, air quality impacts persist.

Marketing and trade dynamics also influence operational behavior. As international buyers increasingly request environmental disclosures for construction materials, refiners supplying paving-grade bitumen face reputational and commercial pressures. Several large infrastructure projects now incorporate environmental performance criteria that extend beyond price and supply reliability. This shift has prompted some producers to re-evaluate processing practices, particularly in export-oriented hubs serving multiple regions.

Despite these developments, the broader picture remains unsettled. Urban air quality strategies often lag behind industrial realities, and bitumen continues to occupy an ambiguous position within environmental policy. The cities examined here demonstrate that the issue is neither isolated nor temporary. It reflects structural tensions between urban development, industrial processing, and environmental capacity.

What distinguishes the current moment is not the discovery of pollution, but the growing specificity of attribution. Air quality data is now granular enough to distinguish between traffic emissions, power generation, and industrial sub-processes such as asphalt production. This clarity reduces the scope for deflection and places responsibility squarely on regulatory design and industrial practice. For cities seeking durable air quality improvements, addressing bitumen processing is no longer optional.

In conclusion, the relationship between bitumen refining, asphalt processing, and urban air quality has entered a new phase of scrutiny. Across the Middle East, Asia, Europe, and North America, evidence points to a consistent, measurable influence on local atmospheric conditions. The challenge ahead lies in translating this recognition into coherent policy and operational change. As infrastructure investment continues worldwide, the environmental footprint of bitumen will remain intertwined with the quality of urban life, demanding sustained attention from regulators, industry, and city governments alike.

By WPB

Bitumen, News, refineries, asphalt, air quality, major cities, world, governments